Comprehending Polysemous Words in Context: A Mixed-Methods Study of EFL Students' Performance, Difficulties, and Comprehension Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i1.3106Abstract
This study investigated Indonesian senior high school EFL students' performance in comprehending polysemous words in context, the difficulties they encountered, and the strategies they employed to infer contextually appropriate meanings. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted involving 107 eleventh-grade students. Quantitative data were collected through a 28-item contextual polysemous vocabulary test developed from authentic contexts found in two official English textbooks, Bahasa Inggris for Change and Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Lanjut. Qualitative data were subsequently obtained through semi-structured interviews with students representing high, moderate, and low-performing groups to explain the quantitative findings. The quantitative results showed that students demonstrated moderate overall performance (M = 60.15), with 47.7% of the participants categorized as low and very low performers. Item-level analysis revealed considerable variation in students' comprehension across individual polysemous words. Based on the types of polysemy, students showed slightly better performance on regular than on irregular polysemous words. Nevertheless, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .056), indicating comparable comprehension across the two types of polysemy. The qualitative findings identified five major sources of difficulty: unfamiliarity with polysemous words, overreliance on dominant meanings, first language interference, limited exposure to multiple meanings, and difficulty distinguishing semantic nuances among answer options. Students employed five principal strategies to overcome these challenges: dictionary use, context analysis, pair discussion, answer-choice analysis, and guessing, with dictionary use emerging as the most frequently reported strategy. These findings underscore the importance of explicit instruction on polysemy and contextual meaning inference to strengthen students' semantic competence and vocabulary learning in EFL classrooms.
References
Amaliah, N., et al. (2025). The challenges of semantic awareness in EFL learners' language accuracy. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.29140/jele.v11i1.312
Alkhonini, O. A. (2025). Addressing polysemy in translation pedagogy. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10 (28). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00328
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620836
Dinana, A. (2024). Primary meaning reliance and context-bound interpretations among Indonesian EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.61204
Hammad, M. (2023). Semantic ambiguity and contextual exposure in target language acquisition. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 3(4), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2023.3.4.12
Jamito, H. G. S., & Simene, G. M. J. P. (2026). The Challenges of Multiple Meanings: Exploring the Mental Lexicon of Bachelor of Arts in English Language Students. Vijoriya International Journal for Research & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.65595/vijri.v2i1.009
Karlsson, M. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of advanced learners' L1 and L2 mastery of polysemous words. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 26, 79-112. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v26i51.97439 Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer-adaptive testing. Language Learning, 54(3), 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00263
Liu, Z. (2025). Analyzing Challenges in English Text Reading Comprehension: The Roles of Polysemy, Phonetics, and Idioms, Scientific Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 7(8), 57-62 https://doi.org/10.54691/1rfrx794
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Pratama, A., et al. (2024). Active processing skills through contextual reading materials in the EFL classroom. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 5(1), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i1.1104
Purwati, T. (2022). Vocabulary size, semantic awareness, and their impact on global reading comprehension. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 3(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v3i2.487
Qu, C. (2023). The correlated influence of semantic types, L1 translation equivalents and language proficiency on EFL learners' production of polysemous words. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162008
Ramadhianti, A., & Somba, S. (2023). READING COMPREHENSION DIFFICULTIES IN INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL) 6(1). 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47080/jeltl.v6i1.2477
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Rushdi, A. E. (2024). 4th Year EFL Iraqi Leaners' Pragmatic Failure in Polysemy. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 8(10), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.25130/lang.8.10.7
Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
Sudarman, S., Sunarti, S., & Hapsari, E. (2022). Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia: A Guideline for Vocabulary Instruction. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v4i1.3225
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Basil Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rita Erlinda, Anggun Fatimah Zahra, Martin Kustati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







